Archive for the 'Presidency' Category

About the Making of TV Show “Lil’ Bush”: The Politics of Washington Seem Like a Schoolyard

Comedy Central Orders Lil' Bush For Next Year

 

Lil’ Bush: Resident of the United States” is a cartoon created by writer/producer Donick Cary (“Letterman,” “The Simpsons”). The idea started out as a series of five-minute cell phone cartoons for Amp’d Mobile in September 2006, and has now become a half-hour series on Comedy Central with two 10-minutes cartoons in each episode.

Lil’ Bush pals around with other young versions of his administration including Lil’ Cheney, Lil’ Condi, and Lil’ Rummy. Lil’ Tony Blair, Lil’ Barack Obama, Lil’ Bill Clinton, and all sorts of other lil’ political leaders have made appearances since the television episodes starting airing June 13, 2007.

If you go to Amp’d Mobile’s site promoting the series, you can watch a “Behind the Scenes of Lil’ Bush,” that contains a short interview with Cary. In it, he explains that he always liked the concept of “shrinking people down” and making them little versions of themselves.

Making a cartoon of a young Bush administration made sense to Cary because “on a basic level” the politics of Washington seem “so childish…it in some ways seems like a schoolyard or like kids just screwing around.” The narrow-minded and supremely confident judgments made by Lil’ Bush and his pals work because they are just innocent kids. It’s funny because you can disassociate the outrageous content of the cartoon (Lil’ Bush giving Bush Senior an Iraqi orphan called “Lamey…because he can’t walk so good” as a feel-good Father’s Day gift to make up for all the negative press coverage from Iraq, for example) from the real, more outrageous problems facing our nation on account of our leadership.

To create the show, Cary collaborates with a group of internet designers and artists from Bulgaria, one of them being a childhood friend. He explains, “It’s been sorta funny, uh, the translation of stuff, cause’ they don’t totally understand why you’d make fun of your president. They were sorta like ‘Isn’t that your leader? You all support him, right?’ And it’s like, n…ah, it’s kinda, you know, 30% of us do and the rest kinda just shrug, you know?” He stumbles through the interview trying not to be “too political” or perhaps, too honest about how the majority of Americans view the President.

I am sure the artists in Bulgaria are not the only ones perplexed by our reported overwhelming disapproval of the President and our endorsement of fake news shows like “The Daily Show” and satirical cartoons like “Lil’ Bush.” Part of living in a democratic state means questioning our elected representatives and having a system of checks and balances. However, have the politics in Washington become so unbelievably unbalanced that the only way to accept the reality is to think of it as fake? Are we accomplishing anything by laughing it off?

I’ll admit, I watch the entire Comedy Central lineup of “Lil’ Bush,” “The Daily Show” and “The Colbert Report” every week, and “Lil’ Bush” makes me laugh out loud – every week. I don’t know if I necessarily feel good about it though.

“Lil’ Bush” currently airs on Comedy Central, Wednesdays at 10:30 p.m., Eastern and Pacific times; 9:30, Central time.

Race, Gender, and the 2008 Presidential Election

“It’s time for us to show the world that we are not a country that ships prisoners in the dead of the night to be tortured in far-off countries, that runs prisons that lock people away without ever telling them why they are there or what they are charged with.  We are not a country that preaches compassion to others while we allow bodies to float down the streets of a major American city.”

“We are America.  We are the nation that liberated a continent from a madman, that lifted ourselves from the depths of Depression, that won civil rights, and women’s rights, and voting rights for all people.  We are the beacon that has led generations of weary travelers to find opportunity, and liberty, and hope on our doorstep.  That’s who we are.”

-Senator Barack Obama, presidential campaign letter

Is the United States ready for a black president?  Or, to be more accurate, multiracial president?  How many U.S. citizens know or care to know Barack Obama’s actual ethnicity?  Does race factor into Obama’s ability to lead our country?  How about a female president? And a ”First Man”/former President at her side?  Why or why not?  The fact that a black or female president is a real possibility in 2008, and oftentimes a difficult subject to talk about in casual company, seems to be a source of tension as the election approaches.  Is it wrong to think that our society, for the most part, has transcended hatred based solely on race or gender?  I imagine most of us know the tension persists - at home, in our neighborhoods, across state lines, and certainly on a global level.

The debate about race and gender politics stemming from the campaigns for the upcoming election encourages citizens to expand their ways of thinking, question what it means to be “American,” and to accept the potential for change.  I receive e-mails and letters from the Barack Obama campaign and enclosed in the last letter was a copy of an article from The New York Times by Thomas L. Friedman (author of The World is Flat) entitled “Obama Could Repair U.S. Image.”  Friedman, a current leading expert on foreign affairs and author of several influential books and articles on the subject, argues that Obama shows the most potential to mend the “broken relationship” between the United States and the rest of the world.

Upon returning from a trip to Africa, Friedman entered the U.S. at the height of the Don Imus controversy (a show on which he had been a guest).  The ordeal, he writes, “underscored how much work we have to do in learning how to listen, talk and yes, joke with one another across racial, gender and religious lines.”  Certainly, the Don Imus controversy highlighted the debate over acceptable speech concerning race and gender not only on morning radio, but in hip-hop music, over the Internet, and throughout all the various media outlets.

Friedman promotes communication on contentious issues, such as the Don Imus case, and argues that Obama (as President) would provide the best moderator for a wide discussion.  He explains, “I believe that what has propelled his candidacy up to now is that many Americans have projected onto him their hunger for community, their hunger for a president with the voice, instincts and moral authority to make it so much harder for foreigners to be anti-American or for Americans to be anti-one another.”  Only an informed leader - someone with experience in civil rights cases and on issues concerning diversity - can communicate effectively with foreign leaders to put the U.S. back in good standing around the world.

Black, white, female, male – connotatively, do these words elicit a more powerful response than they should?

The respect attributed to Barack Obama so far in his campaign gives our society a design of acceptance that can be received with overdue optimism.  Throughout history ordinary men (and I use that term loosely as I feel the term currently reflects mankind and not gender) have transcended to extraordinary status by presenting these models for us to follow.  Right now Obama stands as an ordinary man with extraordinary potential.  However, the contention exists in the fact that if he were to be elected President, the situation’s primary aspect of distinction would be his skin color and the fact that no President before him had dark skin.  He would be the first black President.

This post started out with a seemingly simple question.  However, the question first identifies the individual by color and then by presidential candidate.  Is that the way voters see the upcoming election?   In retrospect, that question may serve as the answer as to whether or not we as a society are ready.

-Thank you to the contributions by Brian Vesci


Add to Technorati Favorites

WidgetBucks

Pittsburgh Bloggers