Archive for the 'Economy' Category

“No Plan, No Capital, No Model…No Problem: Companies That Defied What VCs Will Tell You”

In 2007, starting a business online does not require a great deal of planning, effort, time, or money. James Hong of HotorNot.com and Markus Frind of PlentyofFish.com prove that even with no budget and no set plan, an entrepreneur can find a wide audience and monetize their business online to achieve great profit.

In an extremely informative and eye-opening panel discussion entitled, “No Plan, No Capital, No Model…No Problem: Companies That Defied What VCs Will Tell You,” moderated by start-up guru Guy Kawasaki, five panelists discuss how they started successful online businesses using search engine optimization, open source software, viral marketing, affiliate marketing, and other low or no-cost online tools.

(Follow the link to watch the event - 1 hour, 40 minutes - on Guy Kawasaki’s blog)

Panelists included:

Notable highlights:

-Markus Frind did not spend a dime to start PlentyofFish.com and the idea came as an afterthought while trying to learn ASP.NET. The website generated about $1000/month within the first 3 months from Google Adsense. He didn’t even know venture capitalists existed until a year or two after its launch.

Now, he spends around two hours a day managing the free online dating service that gets twelve billion page views a year. He is the sole employee, only has one server, and makes $5-6 million/year with Google ads.

-James Hong started HotorNot.com as a joke with his friends in October 2000. They launched the first day by telling 40 more of their friends. That day they had about 40,000 people come to the website. They hit 1 million page views a day in 8 days. The site started from no money at all and grew with no financial backing from anyone- not even for equipment or hosting. He explains, “There are still things you need venture capital up front to do, but starting a website is not one of them.”

For similar stories, I highly recommend the book, Founders at Work by Jessica Livingston, author and founding partner of Y Combinator.

Anticipation for Michael Moore’s “Sicko”

SiCKO Ambulance 

Say what you want about Michael Moore, he gets people talking.  His films have been known to end with standing ovations from audiences in theaters.  “Sicko” promises the same - and it opens June 29, 2007.

As a country, we must realize the American healthcare system is broken.  I can’t wait for a serious debate on the topic in which citizens become more informed about how the system works and how we can alleviate the problems.

So in anticipation for the film debut, I wanted to share a small portion of an interview with Michael Moore from TIME magazine’s Jeffrey Kluger (”Moore in the E.R.,” May 17, 2007) on “Sicko”:

TIME: So if there’s no argument that the [healthcare] system is broken, why use your energies to start one?

Moore: Because what’s even more broken is the fact that our Congress and White House are bought and paid for by these two industries, which rival the oil industry in terms of money and influence.  They have a vested interest in maintaining their control.  But they’re not dumb.  They know which way the wind is blowing and that this is the No. 1 domestic issue with Americans.  Their job now is to try to control it so that universal health care is run through them, so that they can still skim the money, make the obscene profits and keep their investors happy.

What was the hardest thing about making this movie?

Getting insurance.  How do you convince an insurance company to insure a film about insurance?  I finally found this guy who’s got a little company out in Kansas City.  I think he’s the only Democrat who owns an insurance company.

After taking aim at so many big targets, who do you plan to go after next?

I don’t know.  I’m going to wait and see how people respond to this.  After that, I think it’s time for a romantic comedy. 

Can Bill Gates Save the World with “Creative Capitalism?”

An article in the June 18, 2007 issue of TIME entitled, “Bill Gates Goes Back to School” by Lev Grossman, highlights Bill Gates’ commencement address to recent Harvard graduates and his acceptance of an honorary degree to the school he dropped out of to eventually co-found Microsoft.  The speech notes his plans t0 leave Microsoft in 2008 and become a full-time philanthropist, directing his efforts to improve global education and global health through the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Follow the first link to the TIME article and the second to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation website for a transcript of his commencement speech - both worth a read.

Gates’ explains during the speech his one big regret about leaving Harvard: “I left Harvard with no real awareness of the awful inequities in the world—the appalling disparities of health, and wealth, and opportunity that condemn millions of people to lives of despair.”  He cites the millions of young people lacking educational opportunities in America, and the millions living in “unspeakable poverty and disease” around the world.  It took him decades to understand the complexity of injustice around the globe, he comments.

At Harvard, Gates took great interest in new discoveries concerning economics, politics, and advances in the sciences.  However, as he realizes now, humanity’s greatest achievements emerge as a result of our ability to apply new discoveries to reduce inequality, such as on issues of democracy, quality health care, and broad economic opportunity.

As a promoter of capitalism, an economic system contributing to his wealth and success at Microsoft, Gates acknowledges the limitations on the system to help the greater good.  During his commencement speech, Gates introduces an idea he calls “creative capitalism.”  Creative capitalism means finding ways to use the market forces to create profit, or at least a living, for more people to serve those suffering from the worst inequalities.   He explains, “If we can find approaches that meet the needs of the poor in ways that generate profits for business and votes for politicians, we will have found a sustainable way to reduce inequity in the world.”

Much like Al Gore as I noted in “Let’s Get Political,” Gates points to the accelerating technologies and information available to today’s college graduates.  Now more than ever we can come to recognize, understand, confront, and solve the problems of disparity at home and abroad.  Gates notes, “You graduates are coming of age in an amazing time. As you leave Harvard, you have technology that members of my class never had. You have awareness of global inequity, which we did not have. And with that awareness, you likely also have an informed conscience that will torment you if you abandon these people whose lives you could change with very little effort…For a few hours every week, you can use the growing power of the Internet to get informed, find others with the same interests, see the barriers, and find ways to cut through them.”

Bill Gates, cited as the wealthiest human being on the planet for over a decade by Forbes magazine, could easily ignore the great inequalities of the world and swim in his billions of dollars.  But Gates has a conscience.  The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has an endowment of more than $33 billion, making it by far the largest charitable foundation in the world, and last year close friend Warren Buffet committed to eventually adding an additional $30 billion (Grossman).  The magnitude of wealth he has acquired and full-time efforts he will dedicate to closing the gap between the rich and the poor in the United States and between first and third world countries provides a model for the youth of the world to follow.  Gates began as an entrepreneur, worked to become wildly successful both in advancing the field of technology and growing a colossal fortune, and now finds his greatest regret in failing to recognize how to use his knowledge, access, and privilege to reduce inequality. 

His speech serves as a reminder to consider the global market and community, in which we all now participate, when designing your career path.  Through technology we all have the ability and opportunity to affect positive change on a global level.

MAKE MONEY ONLINE RIGHT NOW

Being really new to this whole blog scene, I feel like that early 30’s something guy who just recently started shopping at Hot Topic and listens to the new Good Charlotte record. He’s just trying to fit in and be cool like everyone else, but at the same time, he has absolutely no idea what he is doing. That said, I have sort of been doing research on how to drive people to our new blog here, and how to make that oh so sweet cash flow come in too.

 What I realized is that to make money online, you need people to come to your website, and one way to do that is to talk to other people who have blogs and trade links and whatnot. This is where my problem came in.

Everyone and their mother’s blog is about how to make money online. One guy does it right and now 70,000 people copy him. If all I wanted to do with a blog was learn how to make money online, why wouldn’t I just go to the ONLY guy who is doing it right? Not the 70,000 other bloggers who are trying their damndest and not getting anywhere near what they had hoped for.

 Do I want to make money on this blog? YES OF COURSE I DO. Is my blog about making money? NO OF COURSE NOT. I hate when people bite off someone else’s style. Especially when those people are un-interesting, talentless jerks who have nothing decent at all to write about. They spend their time writing about ways to make money on their blog and it isn’t even working for them. I am getting to angry. I need something to calm me down. Where is my “magic eye” poster?

dino.jpg

Sweet! A dinosaur! 

Those who can, do. Those who can’t, blog.

 With all that said.. the new Good Charlotte cd is pretty decent actually.

Fed-Ex Sucks!!

After completing all the artwork needed for children’s book called “The Adventures of Bo, Mo, and Jo”, I needed to send the artwork to the publisher. This way, the book could be printed, and in the hands of the children of the world. The only problem is that the publisher was in Canada, and I’m here in Pittsburgh Pennsylvania.
fedex_kinkos_logo.gif 

At first I didn’t think mailing something to Canada would be a problem, but I soon found out how much I was wrong. Even though Canada is CONNECTED to America, and is often referred to as “

America Jr.”, they still consider any mail going there to be foreign, and special paperwork was needed. I went to my local post office, waited in line, and after five minutes of paperwork and three dollars later, I was on my way. All I was shipping was a CD in a clear jewel case. The post office understood that. They were cool with it. Three bucks. No harm done. I was happy. That was until a week and a half later, and the CD still wasn’t in

Canada.

 images1.jpg

Now the deadline to have the artwork there was only two days away. I figured the only way to get it there on time was to go to my local Fed-Ex, and ship it overnight. Fed-Ex is one of the largest shipping companies in the world, if not the biggest. Their logo, with the hidden arrow in between the E and X is talked about often as one of the best subliminal messages in a logo ever. I’ll admit, the first time I seen the hidden arrow I nearly wrecked my car because I was flipping out. Maybe that’s why I picked Fed-Ex over UPS.. I don’t know. What I do know is that I was walking into a legal tender trap.

 

When I walked into the Fed-Ex, I waited patiently, browsing their selection of $10 Bic ink pens and wall of self motivational CDs until it was my turn. The lady was very helpful. She took my CD with artwork on, helped me fill out the paperwork to mail it “overseas”, and then it hit me with it. $45 dollars to mail the CD. I couldn’t believe it. It’s just a CD, not a bear. But, with the deadline so close, I had no other option so I paid them and went on my way. On the day of the deadline, I received a call from the publisher. They had never received the CD. Almost as soon as I hung up, I got a call from Fed-Ex. They told me they were unable to deliver the package due to customs.

 

“Ok.. So now what” I wondered. They gave me two options. They would either return the package to me for $40 or, abandon the package for $50. So basically I already paid them $45 to ship a package, which they didn’t do. Now, they want me to pay MORE money to have it sent back to me, or EVEN MORE money to destroy it. I was angry. I feel bad now, but I lost my temper with the rep on the phone. I told her I wasn’t going to give them any more of my money, and that I paid them in the first place and it’s no longer my problem. I told them to take care of it. The lady said “that’s fine” and hung up. I’m out $45, and they didn’t even ship my package.

 

This all makes sense seeing as how they are in ka-hoots with Kinkos, which is run by Lucifer, the king of darkness. Maybe some other day I’ll write about how Kinkos charged me $28 to scan a painting for me which was roughly 2 feet wide. In the end, I plan on avoiding Fex-Ex at all costs in the future, and hope that this blog will save you from getting really really pissed off at some point when you need to mail something overseas.. to Canada.


Add to Technorati Favorites

WidgetBucks

Pittsburgh Bloggers